Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter



Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics Second Edition by Milo D. Koretsky
Book Details :
LanguageEnglish
Pages708
FormatPDF
Size13.0 MB


Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics Second Edition by Milo D. Koretsky



PREFACE to Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics book

You see, I have made contributions to biochemistry. There were no courses in molecular biology. I had no courses in biology at all, but I am one of the founders of molecular biology.

I had no courses in nutrition or vitaminology. Why? Why am I able to do these things? You see, I got such a good basic education in the fields where it is difficult for most people to learn by themselves.

AUDIENCE

Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics is intended for use in the undergraduate thermodynamics course(s) taught in the sophomore or junior year in most Chemical Engineering (ChE) and Biological Engineering (BioE) Departments.

For the majority of ChE and BioE undergraduate students, chemical engineering thermodynamics, concentrating on the subjects of phase equilibria and chemical reaction equilibria, is one of the most abstract and difficult core courses in the curriculum.

In fact, it has been noted by more than one thermodynamics guru (e.g., Denbigh, Sommerfeld) that this subject cannot be mastered in a single encounter.

Understanding comes at greater and greater depths with every skirmish with this subject. Why another textbook in this area?


This textbook is targeted specifically at the sophomore or junior undergraduate who must, for the first time, grapple with the treatment of equilibrium thermodynamics in sufficient detail to solve the wide variety of problems that chemical engineers must tackle.

It is a conceptually based text, meant to provide students with a solid foundation in this subject in a single iteration. Its intent is to be both accessible and rigorous.

Its accessibility allows students to retain as much as possible through their first pass while its rigor provides them the foundation to understand more advanced treatises and forms the basis of commercial computer simulations such as ASPEN®, HYSIS®, and CHEMCAD®.

GOALS AND METHODOLOGY

The text was developed from course notes that have been used in the undergraduate chemical engineering classes at Oregon State University since 1994.

It uses a logically consistent development whereby each new concept is introduced in the context of a framework laid down previously. This textbook has been specifically designed to accommodate students with different learning styles.

Its conceptual development, worked-out examples, and numerous end-of-chapter problems are intended to promote deep learning and provide students the ability to apply thermodynamics to real-world engineering problems. Two major threads weave throughout the text:


(1) a common methodology for approaching topics, be it enthalpy or fugacity, and (2) the reinforcement of classical thermodynamics with molecular principles.

Whenever possible, intuitive and qualitative arguments complement mathematical derivations. The basic premise on which the text is organized is that student learning is enhanced by connecting new information to prior knowledge and experiences.

The approach is to introduce new concepts in the context of material that students already know. For example, the second law of thermodynamics is formulated analogously to the first law, as a generality to many observations of nature (as opposed to the more common approach of using specific statements about obtaining work from heat through thermodynamic cycles).

Thus, the experience students have had in learning about the thermodynamic property energy, which they have already encountered in several classes, is applied to introduce a new thermodynamic property, entropy.

Moreover, the underpinnings of the second law—reversibility, irreversibility, and the Carnot cycle—are introduced with the first law, a context with which students have more experience; thus they are not new when the second law is introduced.

LEARNING STYLES

There has been recent attention in engineering education to crafting instruction that targets the many ways in which students learn. For example, in their landmark paper “Learnings and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,”1 Richard Felder and Linda Silverman define specific dimensions of learning styles and corresponding teaching styles.


In refining these ideas, the authors have focused on four specific dimensions of learning: sequential vs. global learners; active vs. reflective learners; visual vs. verbal learners; and sensing vs. intuitive learners.

This textbook has been specifically designed to accommodate students with different learning styles by providing avenues for students with each style and, thereby, reducing the mismatches between its presentation of content and a student’s learning style.

The objective is to create an effective text that enables students to access new concepts. For example, each chapter contains learning objectives at the beginning and a summary at the end.

These sections do not parrot the order of coverage in the text, but rather are presented in a hierarchical order from the most significant concepts down. Such a presentation creates an effective environment for global learners (who should read the summary before embarking on the details in a chapter).

On the other hand, to aid the sequential learner, the chapter is developed in a logical manner, with concepts constructed step by step based on previous material. Identified key concepts are presented schematically to aid visual learners.

Questions about key points that have been discussed previously are inserted periodically in the text to aid both active and reflective learners.

Examples are balanced between those that emphasize concrete, numerical problem solving for sensing learners and those that extend conceptual understanding for intuitive learners.

In the cognitive dimension, we can form a taxonomy of the hierarchy of knowledge that a student may be asked to master. For example, a modified Bloom’s taxonomy includes: remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create. The tasks are listed from lowest to highest level.


To accomplish the lower-level tasks, surface learning is sufficient, but the ability to perform at the higher levels requires deep learning.

In deep learning, students look for patterns and underlying principles, check evidence and relate it to conclusions, examine logic and argument cautiously and critically, and through this process become actively interested in course content.

In contrast, students practicing surface learning tend to memorize facts, carry out procedures algorithmically, find it difficult to make sense of new ideas, and end up seeing little value in a thermodynamics course.

While it is reinforced throughout the text, promotion of deep learning is most significantly influenced by what a student is expected to do. End-of-chapter problems have been constructed to cultivate a deep understanding of the material.

Instead of merely finding the right equation to “plug and chug,” the student is asked to search for connections and patterns in the material, understand the physical meaning of the equations, and creatively apply the fundamental principles that have been covered to entirely new problems.

The belief is that only through this deep learning is a student able to synthesize information from the university classroom and creatively apply it to new problems in the field.


Download Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics Second Edition by Milo D. Koretsky in PDF format for free.